![]() ![]() They will use their habitual expectations, derived from established social-scientific practice, as a frames of reference in understanding this unusual species of scientific work. This may contribute to the confusion of readers who are not familiar with this particular research style. CA papers tend to be exclusively devoted to an empirically based discussion of specific analytic issues. Interests and practices of Conversation Analysis Most practitioners of CA tend to refrain, in their research reports, from extensive theoretical and methodological discussion. As such it is methodologically 'impure', but it works. It has developed some very practical solutions to some rather thorny methodological problems. Conversation Analysis is a disciplined way of studying the local organization of interactional episodes, its unique methodological practice has enabled its practitioners to produce a mass of insights into the detailed procedural foundations of everyday life. I will discus some of the major criticisms leveled against it and touch on some current developments. ![]() I will present CA's research strategy as a solution to ethnomethodology's problem of the 'invisibility' of common sense and describe it in an idealized form as a seven step procedure. ![]() In doing so, I will discuss some of the problems and dilemma's conversation analysts deal with in their daily practice, using both the literature and my own experiences as resources. In this paper, I will describe some of those features in the interest of exploring their grounds. It studies the social organization of 'conversation', or 'talk-in-interaction', by a detailed inspection of tape recordings and transcriptions made from such recordings. ![]() Conversation Analysis (CA), a research tradition that grew out of ethnomethodology, has some unique methodological features. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |